Life of an average joe

These essays cover a tour in Afghanistan for the first seventeen letters home. For an overview of that tour, and thoughts on Iraq, essays #1, #2 and #17 should suffice. Staring with the eighteenth letter, I begin to recount -- hopefully in five hundred words -- some daily aspects of life in Mexico with the Peace Corps.



Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Letter to Friends & Familiares #74: World View



To everyone, what a great array of criticisms. They represent opportunities for improvement through reconfiguring ideas or creating new ones, the totality of which will – in that damnably ideal world – lead to a better approach to some basic problems.
Thanks to Ken White for kicking off the discussion with specific ideas and alternatives tied to specific points in the essay. That stimulated the thinking of many others.
Unfortunately, answering each thought will take too much space. Perhaps, it would be better for me to lay bare those implicit assumptions that I have made; they really derive from my world-view, as limited as it is. Before I do that, however, there are some assertions made that deserve acknowledgement.
These points follow in no particular order and my responses are vague since I am bunching most ideas into summary thoughts animating these answers.
1st, the primary idea I have tried to raise, and perhaps had not thought through clearly enough, is one of enforceability within the civilian chain of command. The affiliation of civilian agencies to the Chief-of-Party in the Embassy, especially involving people stationed away from that Embassy, has appeared to be nominal to me.
2nd, everyone has, to some extent, mentioned the necessity of choosing interventions carefully. That is right on target. Militarily led interventions are costly and, too often, end up being a string of one-off efforts the only coherence of which is the failure of civilian leadership to own up to failed initiatives.
3rd, the time horizon for the kinetic activity may well be six months or less; I would defer to your sentiments. The point made is a good one for all to remember: the mission must be self-contained, attainable and very, very compelling.
4th, the idea of this framework being “state and societal westernization” (i.e., colonialism) shocked me. Not because it was so wrong but because it may be on-the-money. The idea of leaving spaces ungoverned is troubling but not new. Governance in these vexing cases (e.g., Pakistan and Afghanistan) may need to be started from the bottom, not led from the top.
5th, expectations need to be kept low, making it clear that the locals have to reclaim their lives torn by conflict. Ultimately it is they who define the community policing mission and lead it. I made a typographical error, and a key one, in the article. The sentence should read: “Special Forces officers or sympathetic civilians, no matter how high-minded, can NOT take that frightening first step for these moderates.” My apologies for that.
6th, many of the insurgencies and other quandaries we face are truly “Born” or “Made” in the U.S.A. For instance, I still wonder why the great majority of Americans, whom I encounter and who understand the paradigmatic relevance of our own country’s revolution, seem to be in the military.
Well, those are the immediate reactions. Please be assured that each thought you made lurks within and behind one or more of these responses. As far as clarifying the unsaid assumptions (i.e., defining my world view), I will tuck those in a second comment for those of you really interested in them.
Thank you again for making the writing of this article in Small wars Journal a rewarding experience for me.
Ned
Edward J. McDonnell III
U.S. Peace Corps
Querétaro, México.


INTRODUCTION
These comments clarify, with brutal honesty, the unspoken and later exposed assumptions underlying my admittedly idealistic ‘thought’ experiment. The problem with my essays lies in the necessity to make them intelligible and brief. That means streamlining reference conditions into an ideal state devoid of those damned details.
The essay I wrote was requested indirectly by an SOF officer whose thinking, as reflected by his refreshingly creative idea of a Venture Capital Green Beret, resonated with me since so much of what we do in other countries depends on the everyday tasks executed by people at the bottom of the chain; in this case, in Afghan villages.
WORLD VIEW
We live in a time of uncertainty. The nation-state political model and market-based capitalism are imposing their limits every day. Afghanistan, Pakistan, Somalia, et al. may not be countries, after all. At least in the first two cases, I can conjure up some history to support that. (For example, Afghanistan is defined not by a singularly ethnic people but by the arbitrary borders of three defunct empires).
My thinking may be colonialist. One of the great challenges under which we labor is the fact that, as observed by CPT Gilmore (via "Lieutenant Zuckerberg") in his excellent case for open-innovation in the military through social media, we live in a world of instant knowledge, if not wisdom. That is, we can no longer forget about the bottom billion.
These wretched of the earth now know they are the bottom billion and what they are missing. To them, capitalism may seem more like an excuse to keep them down than a way for them to pull themselves, and others, out of misery. Communications has made poverty a structural violence apt to breed lethal violence against more affluent innocents.
This lamentable state perversely reflects my deepest prejudice: that most people simply want their lives and, more importantly, the lives of their children to be more comfortable and fulfilling (i.e., assuming their properly ordained stature in the eyes of God, however conceived). This requires liberty to act, to choose, to risk.
Added to this problem of self-aware poverty and models that may no longer apply so neatly, America confronts an imbalance of power and resources skewed toward procurements of newer weapons systems that may be creating tools in search of a solution in search of a problem. The military shares some culpability here, to be sure.
Nevertheless, this structural problem in our society manifests the failure of elected leadership to do its job: to lead. Thus the traditionally last resort option of military intervention has become a plan-B that puts our finest citizens – you – in harm’s way because some political leader lacks creativity, resourcefulness or sturdy ego to look ‘soft’ in the eyes of an electorate (s)he fails to understand or influence.
The reliance on militarily initiated interventions has also grown out of a chronic shortage of qualified civilians truly committed to stepping up and assuming the same risks as their uniformed colleagues; thus, embedding in village patrols is seen a s reckless. Training to make these citizens’ competences concurrent with their characters is lacking due to the time required (which defies Plan-B impulses).
CONCLUSION
If we are brushing up against the limits of nation-statism and Western economics, not to mention fiscal insolvency – and that limit is turning out to be the edge of a cliff – such uncertainty begs the question of how or if we should respond. That perplexity shrouds an opportunity to restore American exceptionalism in a fluid world after the American Century.
It is your personal example, and not American money or firepower, that will prevail over time. Think of Viet Nam now versus 1975; we won the hearts and minds of the rising generation. Without hesitation, I believe we can respond, but from the ground, up.
We may not build a state but we can enable people to start making something out of nothing, which really is the framework behind seed investing and venture capitalism. Many of these efforts will fail, as do some investments in a portfolio. Over time, the net effect should be worthwhile (and a lot cheaper).

Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Letter #73: An evening of ordinary magic in an extraordinary culture


México is, perhaps, the most exotic place in which I have ever lived, though that is not too many places.  Funny thing about México, she borders the great melting pot and yet may well be more diverse than the United States.  This letter should have come out a week or more ago but I was too busy (i.e., lazy) to get around to doing this.

Two days before I left for Maryland to have a splendid time with the Purnells, a colleague at the science center, where I serve the Peace Corps over easy, approached me and said he needed to speak with me about something.  We had been meaning to meet over the preceding two days, something I instantly forgot because this urgency emerged on a Friday afternoon.

My heart sank. Hmmm.  Mystified yet pessimistic, I braced myself into my professional stoicism.  My colleague asked me straight-away whether or not I was busy on Saturday.  Still mystified yet a little less pessimistic, I said, “No, not really – nothing I cannot change…” (Of course, I did not want to admit that my big event the Saturday before Christmas was packing for the trip the next day.)

“Good!” said he, handing me a little vase – the clear type with a long Audrey Hepburn neck for one rose – with a scroll tucked inside it.  Completely confused, I knew I was being invited to something, something Mexican, which means time consuming and inconvenient because I had just re-engaged in a new reading spurt. 

Truthfully, I desired nothing more than to get back to my book on Henry Flashman, a sexually maniacal and acutely yellow British captain who had lived through the slaughter of Her Majesty´s army in Afghanistan under the gored Lord Elphinstone in 1842.  So, out of service to my country as I serve fearlessly in the Peace Corps, I would sacrifice another Saturday in solitude in order to witness some event filled with music I do not enjoy and chatter I can better live without in English, let alone Spanish.

Gazing dumbly away as these thoughts cascaded through my wretched little mind, my joyful colleague snapped me back to the here and now by saying with a smile showing his genuine kindness, “Mi novia (girlfriend or, in México, fiancée) y yo are finally getting married…”  I exploded with joy.  I was not getting chastised; this fine guy – whose abilities one inevitably respects – was not terribly upset or even criticizing me. 

More important, my compañero and his better half have been simpático for a good long time.  In fact, his fiancée has always been very gracious to me.  The vase had the invitation.  Before I knew how to extract the message in the bottle, other colleagues rallied around the desk to set the time and place to pick me up for a ride to the wedding “a little way's” out of town.

As I went for my Friday night run, I worried about how I would manage at a wedding in México, with my ‘fawlty’ Spanish.  Yet I was excited.  Most other volunteers had gone to such big-ticket events far earlier in their tours.  To be sure, I had attended my share of festivities for Christmas, the Epiphany (a big deal in México), Independence Day, Easter, countless birthdays and the rest.  But never a wedding.  And yet that spiritual blight inside of me that makes even unanticipated high-points dully anti-climactic was already weaseling its way into my heart. 

It was three o´clock on a warm Saturday afternoon – hitting around eighty degrees (about twenty-seven celsius) at its peak – and I had clocked my long run for the week (of five miles).  Slightly dehydrated and hunger allayed by a ‘pan dulce’ (a sugary biscuit), I got to the bus stop right on time to get the ride with other colleagues from the office.  Of course, I had the Flashman follies tucked under my arm, thinking I would read it during the ride and, maybe, at the wedding if I got bored and was trapped “a little way’s out of town”.

Equally of course, the book soon became an appendage and then a thorn in the flesh.  No Flashman frolicking amongst the Pashtuns this twenty-second day of December 2012, indeed.  I sat in the very back seat of the S.U.V. across from a compañero of whom I am fond because, like me, he was once a banker, apparently relishing the field as much as I had.  This gentleman, and he really is one in his patrician manner, talked about what we always talked about: the Free Masons. 

Undeterred by utter ignorance, I tend to speak from the view of how important the Masons were in liberalizing Europe and founding the American republic.  My colleague spoke about how the Masons have evolved into some new world order; he is convinced that this clique conspired to assassinate President Kennedy.  As always, I said (sincerely, for once) what I believe: that Lee Harvey Oswald most likely acted alone and that the many theories floating around arise from people’s unwillingness to accept the chaotic possibility that a schmeau can murder the leader of the Free World.

As the ride progressed more than “a little way’s out of town”, however, we migrated beyond the usual small-talk about global cabals, conspiracies and coups d’état.  My colleague told me about his background, and what an interesting family he came from.  In México, one has two surnames.  The first is the one inherited from the father in a patrilocal society tottering in an uneasy truce with a matrilineal culture, which is reflected in the second surname: the maiden name of the mother.

This colleague’s disparate appellations have, for the first, a traditional Mexican name (for Tower) followed by his mother´s Polish maiden name (because it ends with an “i”).  Apparently, his father was an engineer in a day when México produced far fewer and when even fewer Mexicans went to college.  Nowadays, México likely produces more engineering graduates relative to its population than even China.  So, my friend’s father came from “nice people”; respectable, not rich, and emphasizing education.  While his father was somewhat like my own, his mother’s story was interesting.

We got around to that lineage through the hidden rope ladder up a Polish family tree.  We started talking about Pope John Paul II, a fabulously popular pontiff across México – perhaps more so in death than he had been in life.  The ongoing veneration of Juan Pablo II reminds me of the same worship Jordanians still reserve for King Hussein after twelve years in the Gardens of Eden where sweet waters flow and veiled virgins with almond eyes serve fresh pomegranates and figs.

My banking buddy told me about his mother’s family.  As a little one, she might well have been a contemporary of the young, earnest Wojtila, without knowing the path in store for Karol.  The family was prosperous, part of the intellectual bourgeoisie.  Though likely infected to some extent by the anti-semitism afflicting most Catholics in Europe at the time, this family hated the Nazis and fled, as the Wehrmacht butchered their homeland, eventually setting in México. 

If I remember the pageant correctly, the parents came together through the crudest artifice of fate: the blind date.  Like my own mother, coming of age as a Catholic teen a little later, my friend´s mother detested Pope Pius XII for selling out the Jews and not doing what a good Christian ought to do: standing up to naked evil preying upon the vulnerable.  Yes, we readily agreed that Pius XII should not be a saint, despite Rome’s current and preliminary efforts to make him one. 

This accord led to opinions about the current bishop of Rome, Pope Benedict XVI, himself a German and an erstwhile (if short-lived) member of the Hitler youth roadies.  After I pointed out the tolerance toward Jews and Muslims shown in the new catechism of Juan Pablo II and edited by then Cardinal Ratzinger as head of the Inquisition, my colleague agreed that Benedicto may be a stern-looking S.O.B. but is fundamentally a decent, if be-jeweled, man.  Such exotic stories are not too uncommon in México.

After this heady talk and languishing in the barren but beautiful landscape of dusty hills, scrub-brush and ever-resilient nopales (a cactus that looks like a cross between a bonsai tree and a Calderesque mobile of martian hush-puppy ears), we arrived some eighty minutes later at an old hacienda (i.e., the Spanish-moorish version of an ante-bellum plantation house) modernized into a hotel and events center.  The place was beautiful; elegant in a colorful yet subtly melancholic way. 

The main building was basically a square, two storey box with large widows sealed by drawn drapes of a rich, heavy velvet (I think).  The walls in the ante room, an indoor porch without a screen, were dark blue tiles with Moorish patterns resembling brilliantly precise yet small mandalas.  At the end of the outdoorsy alcove was a suit of armor that looked more like that worn in medieval France than the stuff of conquistadors.  The outer wall was a milk-chocolate brown set in a soft-edge but very rough stucco. 

The building was so big that a blind man reading braille could have read Don Quixote simply by running his fingers along the wall.  Those images hit that long-ago activated perception that Mexican culture really has much in common with that of the Middle East.  While many Mexicans have their mestizo past clearly etched in their faces and frames, a goodly number of women do not and, with their darker complexions, coal-fired eyes and wavy black hair, they more resemble those several desert darlings who have made me swoon in that blazing Arabian sun…

…until I got indoors with the modern assurance of air conditioning and cold sparkling water.  We had arrived three minutes late and I was nervous…unique I was, in being so, inside the car.  Nevertheless, I had my apologies and excuses ready for deployment.  We were the first to arrive.  And so I started another tutorial on the calming effect of mañana.  Not even the two colleagues getting married seemed to be around.  In truth, they were inside exchanging their vows quietly and privately.  Our presence was needed at the reception.  The wedding was different than others I have attended in the United States.

Aside from not witnessing the sacrament, there were appetizers aplenty, while the ceremony took place.  As people began arriving, many from the science center where I work, we basically loafed in a richly lawned yard punctuated by Spanish oaks, looking onto a traditional cactus garden and the fiesta tent with tables appointed and ready to go.  The magic of late autumn in Querétaro is that, as the sun goes down (as it did that day), so do the temps by a good fifteen degrees (eight celsius). 

In that chilly twilight, I finally relaxed enough to take in the fantastic beauty of the scene.  The sky was a darkening blue, and thanks to the relative absence of catalytic converters in México, the clouds – looking like incomplete canopies – crawled from a quiet white to dusky rust, settling finally into a curdled red.  Relaxing there, I remarked to my colleagues that this setting on this day for this event was so breathlessly perfect that one would not forget it.  I hope I never do.

Finally, I saw the married couple.  My compañero’s novia has always impressed me as handsome in a matronly way, as she has been a single mother for many years, fetching after two very well bred teens.  Though this was a civil ceremony because she was divorced, this lady was in a slightly mauve wedding dress – a new image for me – that was as beautiful in its cuts and folds as its material was costly.  She was, in a word, elegant.  Beautifully elegant.  Seeing her frequently in office clothes without the make-up delicately applied had obscured that obvious fact from me.

Knowing full well that I had been included at the last minute as some other invitee declined, I marched straight over to the couple. My colleague was wearing a formal dinner suit and looked pretty gentlemanly himself.  It is safe to say that I was the only guest wearing a blazer with a Peace Corps patch on the breast pocket.  As I approached them, I tried quickly to rehearse a clever compliment, not an easy thing to do in a tongue beyond my limited reach.  In the end, I stammered something sincere. 

Looking into her blue eyes, I told the bride just what I told you – that I had never realized just what a beauty she really is.  Mexican women are like that: an intoxicatingly feminine fierceness; I cursed myself for frittering away my twenties in Pittsburgh.  In the deepest pocket of my heart, I really hope México does not lose this sense of traditional gender differentiation as she modernizes.  Manners will always have a special place in my universe if no longer in my country. 

Warming up to my compliment to his wife, my compañero laughed and suggested that I get a new pair of glasses.  Of course, I thanked them for squeezing me in because this would be a day like none other for me in México, not only because of the splendid elegance of the people and party but because of my happiness at seeing a perfect match perfect that match.  After two minutes or so, I did not want to tie the couple up too long since I was not high on the guest list pecking order. 

Thus I parted artfully by saying to my compañero, a fellow bachelor (though many years younger), “Alix, soy único en poder decirle, ‘¡mejor tarde que nunca!’” (Alex, I am uniquely qualified in saying, “Better late than never!”).  We all laughed and I sauntered back to the others, growing to a group of eight or ten now near the bar and fetched my drink with a fistful of ‘Japanese nuts’ which are peanuts coated in some type of synthetic, flavorful shell.  I justified such nutritional oversight by claiming that I enjoy international cuisine and doling out the penny-food like some forgotten delicacy. 

The thirty minutes left before dinner were devoted to introducing myself to co-workers´ spouses and children as well as making goofy remarks, which I could now get away with doing since most people were well into the evening’s trajectory.  One thing my parents trained me very well to do – and for which I remain indebted to them to this day – is the art of small talk, though the tipsiness of others makes that a good deal easier.  Widely condemned by most people I know (i.e., earnestly open-minded baby boomers), I am a contrarian about such ‘vacuous verbiage’. 

In actuality, this much damned chitter-chatter is kinship in code.  Many years and drinks ago, I learned that, except in moments of extraordinary intimacy (perhaps ten times in the course of a lifetime, if one is lucky), authenticity usually collapses quickly into garbled garbage, waiting to rot into extinction after an ill-advised sally into solipsism.  After all, who does not know that most lives are not perfect most of the time?  Humoring the drudgery of daily life not only makes for a cheap laugh but for some unexpected meaning.  This surprising energy is measured in giggle-whats.

At dinner, I was seated with one of my counterparts and the head of the Department where we work and his family.  Again, I put to work a lesson taught me by my mother when we were in Sydney over four decades ago.  When my family first arrived in Australia, my father was asked to many cocktail parties with various Australian and ex-pat businessmen and some government types, too.  Now came my father’s turn to fortify the network with a cocktail party of his own.  Dad was worried that, being relatively junior and new to town, most people would not show up.  My mother assured him that she had the answer to calm his fears.

In the Australia, and the America, of the 1960s, most women were married with children and contented themselves with, or resigned themselves to, being home-makers.  Things were just beginning to change as divorce became more of an option and women were willing to brave the risks of striking out on careers.  In the international business community, the eventuality of duel earners was still a worst-case scenario.  In Sydney, husbands and wives in the middle class often led very separate lives; that is, wives were not invited to business functions, though men partied with the abandon of little boys while their better halves watched the “Monkees” with their little darlings.

So, ingeniously, my mother invited the wives and the invitation basically nudged beyond simple encouragement into polite coercion.  BING! Perfect attendance.  Well that adventure in ancient history has come in handy in México.  In many ways, Mexican men still have ‘traditional’ proclivities toward monopolizing air-time.  It is a bit like Afghanistan.  The Pashtuns may run around yelling and screaming, brandishing guns and other substitutes.  Yet behind those mud-walls of family villages, when the gloves and burkhas come off, we know who is really calling the shots.

So, I did the logical thing: not only defy hierarchy by talking to the jefe but blow past that convention to striking up conversations with the quiet wife and diffident daughter.  All of this was not crass manipulation.  Often, I find new people – once I wiggle beyond that damn shyness – to be interesting. Additionally, I got a chance to see what makes the jefe tick.  He is a very good man; like most finance types, he sees himself as a guardian and is quiet, unspontaneous and a better front-line blocker than any in the N.F.L.  So seeing the reflection of him, inferred through the lens of his family was something I would not pass up.

Besides both women were pretty and, after the second sentence, quite obviously educated and thoughtful. The dinner was great fun.  The daughter is in ninth grade and wants to be a dentist – we had fun trying to figure out how an accountant and an engineering major produced a dentist.  Then came the typical antics with having fun with people’s names.  The wife, Carolina by name, was a lovely woman. One thing I find so interesting here in México is that some of the mostly worldly people I meet have never left the country, often never transgressed more than a few hundred miles from the epicenter of their lives.  So, I had Carolina lined up as a Charleston belle while Diana enjoyed being the goddess of the hunt.

Finally, the jefe loosened up and I heard him laugh heartily for the first time ever.  The family told me all about growing up in an adjoining state in Central Mexico, while I double-dared them to meet and neck in the Alley-of-Amor in the cultural center of their home state.  Diana enjoyed being treated with respect like an adult.  I must say I marvel at how well behaved most Mexican youngsters are.  To be sure: they raise a different kind of hell than their Yankee counterparts; but when it counts, they know how to act.  Mexico truly has a culture that exalts good upbringing (at least in the upper half of the society).

Apparently, a number of people never found the hacienda and so the bride and groom had the waiters dish out seconds.  Well-cooked Mexican fare is a treat, especially for a Peace Corps volunteer living on a decent but not lavish stipend.  This evening was a big treat.  Previously, I had actually shed a kilo or two in México; but I did my best to reinstall it that night.  México has this spicy sausage called chorizo; a lot of it was left over and I went to town. 

Just call me high German nobility: Baron von Blimpoman.  Finally, as things started getting a bit tedious (i.e., beyond my pathetic attention span), the lights dimmed.  I thought, well this is it: I will be home by ten o’clock.  Cool.  I can read.  False alarm.  We were treated to a biographical slide show.  My compañero is a real picarro and is handsome to boot…so the photos of a cute little monster were no surprise. The pictures of his new wife were surprising for reasons I know not.  She looked the same but younger and she had been a darling.  Her facial expressions reminded me of something.

During this slide show, she was standing and so I looked at her, thinking it was bizarre for her to be wearing a wedding gown on her second marriage.  Then, by the grace of God or the heart-burn of that chorizo, I suspended judgement of other human beings for a second – just long enough to realize how utterly lovely she was in that gown.  Why?  Because she looked great?  True, but not that.  Because she wanted a real wedding since the first had not worked? No, not that, either.  So my simple mind got to thinking why.  And those childhood pictures, now flashed into time-progressing snaps of a couple of ten years’ happiness, solved the riddle.  Ana Maria was not wearing that expensive gown for her, but for him.  Of course, el Señor Dagwood Dolt, this is Alix’s first marriage.  Ana Maria wanted the day to be special for him.  What a party!

With this slide presentation, exceeded in mirth only by genuine affection, the dancing began and I was looking to dance.  The week before, when I finally condescended to show up at the office Christmas party after slinking out on the first two in 2010 and 2011, I finally had gotten the nerve to dance with a dazzlingly beautiful Mexican gal, young enough to be my daughter.  Truth be told: I do not like most Mexican music – except for one two songs with live Mariachi or older, more classical strains.  Unapologetically, I find it discordant, loud, repetitive and generally grating to my ever thinner inner ear. 

At that Christmas party, I had been joking that I would love to dance with several of the two dozen ladies I know there.  Well one young lady called me out, not out of any appeal I have but, more likely, to shut me up.  Now this lady is truly young enough to be my daughter and she yanked me onto the dance floor – the plaza in the middle of the research campus, draped with a tent that evening – in full view of her two sisters, a brother in law and, oy-vey, her mother.  No escape.  Glad I did not.  When we got to the floor, I just did an impromptu jitterbug to Mexican music, a recipe for certain cross border complications.  Except that Leticia had a supple sense of rhythm as limber as a lynx. 

Truthfully, Leticia did not improve my dancing as much as made it less apparently bad.  After about five minutes, I started feeling like I ought to get off the dance floor and allow some of the younger engineers to dance with Leticia.  Leticia is really beautiful; she could be a runway model – no joke.  Nevertheless, her ambition is to put her mind to work and, from what I gather, she is an excellent engineer doing great work in a complex joint venture with an international aerospace firm.  Yet, Leticia refused my repeated entreaties to beat a hastily honorable exit.  She kept on dancing, and I kept on gimping  

Finally, my knee gave out and we had to call it quits .  After walking her back to her family, I gallantly put Leticia’s shawl on her shoulders because it was chilly and announced to her family that “Leticia me impulsaba hacia la tumba. Sin embargo, ¡qué bonita manera para salir!” (Letty was driving me to my grave but what a way to go!)  Leticia taught me a valuable lesson about her culture, which I intended to put to good use at this wedding reception since I knew a number of women: in México, it is not about whether one can dance, play golf or anything else. 

South of the border, it comes down to having fun and making sure your partner is having as much fun as you are.  Who thought that up?  So the dancing at this wedding, filled with well-wishers who had known and cared for these people for many years (plus one goof running around with a Peace Corps patch on his blazer), fired up very quickly easing into overdrive with little notice.  I was psyched and then slammed into the big difference between the Mexico of today and the America of my parents: people do not dance with each other’s spouses.  Mexican men will not permit it.  There were only two unmarried (or unengaged) people there: me and the company beauty.

This lady radiates the kind of innocent sexiness that snared me on day-1.  Only problem is she is paired off with one of the young engineers.  In our management meetings, I have seen her look at him in a way that only two women have ever looked at me – and they truly loved me.  I remember one time in B-School, a lovely class-mate came up to me while I was buying coffee from a sweet elderly black woman who was my caffeine buddy.  Anyways, this class-mate came and asked me how I did on some accounting test or some such thing.  I made some dumb-ass answer as I always did to avoid a bad habit of being competitive. 

As my class-mate walked away chuckling at my alleged humor, my off-line coffee mentor said, “What are you waiting for, Neddy?”  That startled me and I asked her why she said that.  This woman was wise and she did not miss a beat, “That girl has love in her eyes…”  I said, “But, Clara, she is married…”  Clara seemed to think that was a mere annoyance.  Of course, I never pursued it because I am selfish – I do not want to feel like a piece of dung.  That is the way the company beauty has looked at that engineer, not at me.  Besides, that engineer is a good friend of mine and a damnably decent fellow.  Why mess everything up for something that would not work and would be all wrong? 

So I contented myself with making broken witticisms in my sort-of second language and did not dance.  Damn shame.  By eleven, with the day eight hours old and me getting ready to head north the next day, I lobbied hard for us to leave.  But Alix told us to wait a few more minutes for the end times, Mayan no-shows notwithstanding.  They were worth the wait.  Alix and Ana Maria led us all out back and treated all hundred and fifty of us to some colorful and sustained fireworks.  What a great night and what a great idea. 

As my fellow car-pool members beckoned me to the car, I took the newly-weds aside and said that I had good news and bad news.  They looked at me somewhat concerned and I started with the good news: the fireworks were a spectacular end to spectacular wedding.  Then I hesitated in the cool December breeze.  Ana Maria asked me pointedly what the bad news was.  I leaned forward and whispered “No quiero decirlo pero la Independencia es en septiembre…” (I hate to say this but the Mexican Independence Day is in September).  I caught up to my compañeros, launched by the hearty laughs of people in love and loving it.

Saturday, December 8, 2012

Letter 72: Why invading Syria is a bad idea...

BLUF (bottom-line up-front): any prescribed policy in a conflict zone is nothing more than a smartly presented best-case scenario.

A (LAST) Chance Meeting. We had known each other for a few weeks from the common tent out behind the Embassy. But Antony was a great guy. Former red-coat on special duty in Ireland, he had a far better idea than I about these types of situations, in places like Belfast or Baghdad. What I also enjoyed was his intellect. Long before, various Brits had taught me that one need not go to college to be an incisive thinker.


Much like activated National Guardsmen from across ‘the pond’; Antony was more than a citizen-soldier: he was a thinking soldier. Two things I lamented in my friendship with him: that Lieutenant Cunningham – a brave and fair young lass in the U.S. Army – never reciprocated his fancy for her and, far worse, the day he told me that, after just six weeks in-country, he was fed up and heading home to England. 

“Why, Antony?” I asked already ruing the loss of a brief but meaningful acquaintance.

“Because, Ned, the way this is going, there will be regional war before it’s over…”

Marshalling up my splendidly articulate ignorance, I said rather flippantly, “Lighten up! It’s only Iraq…”

Antony winced and shook his head, not so much dismissively but in an unspoken message, “Trust me, you’ll get it soon enough…” And I did. Antony’s dark message has not come to pass, yet. Nevertheless, we have seen the emergence of the ‘Shi´ite crescent’ and the anxiety raised by Sunnis across the Middle East as President Bush’s surge narrowly averted a sectarian genocide…once.

Antony's Enduring Whisper. In recalling that conversation of eight and a half years ago, I am reminded again of why the hardest thing to do at times is nothing. We read every day that thousands upon thousands of Syrians have died at the hands of a dictator not yet gone but definitely gone rogue. This slow-motion slaughter has been unfolding for a year or more; chemical weapons (probably taken in from Saddam before his régime collapsed in 2003) may be next. We have done very little during this violence; there probably is not much we can do.

What the West is failing to understand is that the Arab Spring will have a violent dimension to it. Most revolutionary contagions do. Though I fear for the safety of Israël and, with her, democracy no matter how flawed, there are also so violent sectarian upheavals shaking the foundations of Islam itself.  Truth is, from the standpoint of theology, Judaism and Islam are closer together than either is with Christianity.

The emergence of Shi´ism and its veneration of certain prophets or great imams as Christ-like as well as its mythology of the hidden imam certain to return in glory to judge the quick and the dead, has catalyzed a centuries-long conflict.  This religious persecution and in-fighting has played out on the extremes of both theological dialects. 

Most Muslims, Sunni or Shi´ite, follow the prophet’s guidance of clean living, clear devotion and prayerful peace. Unfortunately, part of the Arab Spring is our having to watch, with pained passivity, a dangerously bloody revulsion on two levels:
  • the over-reach and ultimate repudiation (probably violent) of extremist movements that tend to fare better in the shadows of secular totalitarianism than in the new light of freedom; as well as, 
  • the popular, probably violent, overthrow of secular dictators using brutality to keep their money coming and their countries quiet.
After that revulsion is exhausted, ironically, it may well be Israel who will lead the way to peaceful relations through democracies predicated on faith yet dedicated to tolerance. Until then, sadly, it will be a bloody process. Let’s look at some of the antecedents to the current dilemmas of Syria facing the West.

Who the hell invited N.A.T.O.? From the parochially American point of view, what we are seeing is the fall-out from the intervention in Libya.  The N.A.T.O. mission was to take out the weapons of slaughter at a dictator’s disposal.  That noble end quickly morphed into an assassination campaign of that dictator himself. Now that ugly Qaddafi was one nasty dude, no doubt. Nevertheless, he had tried to clean up his act, at least to the world outside.

The crazy Colonel had not sponsored terrorism for two decades and foresworn development of weapons of mass-destruction seven years ago. In Libya, N.A.T.O. sent the wrong signal to other dictators, like the one in Syria: “You might as well fight it out to the death because we will kill you when we want to kill you whether you have ‘gone civilized’ or not…"
The European Hangover.
Much of the current turmoil probably goes back for more than a millennium. Nonetheless, a lot of the problems into which N.A.T.O. currently inserts itself are forcing (more likely inviting) a traditionally anti-imperialist country, the United States, into participating in the clean-up of past European colonialism. 

Kiss the hard earned the U.S. reputation for credibility and fairness good-bye. If France and Italy or even the United Kingdom feel compelled to do something about Syria, Libya, Egypt etc., then let NATO intervene. As we did under President Eisenhower in 1956 with respect to Britain, France and Israël ganging up on Egypt, the U.S. should stake out an unambiguous position that it will not participate in military attacks in the case of Syria.

The United States should signal clearly that it is ready to use its assets only for humanitarian missions. In the interim, U.S. diplomats publicly lobby Islamic nations in more peaceful parts to supply peace-keepers. That will force the ex-colonialists to live with the choices they make today and resolve their miscues of yesterday.


Timing is everything. The late hour of all of this diplomatic dithering, curiously furious within weeks following the U.S. elections, casts the sincerity of U.S. intentions into doubt. Twice the number Mexicans have died due to drug wars – behind which the U.S.-based demand and the failed policy of the ‘War on Drugs’ remain the big drivers – than in Syria. No response to the 85,000 dead in Mexico.  

Our soldiers have been exploited shamelessly for eleven years, often to cover for failed policies. Many of our citizen soldiers have fought twice or thrice as long as did those of the greatest generation. Whoops. There is no direct and compelling national interest for the U.S. in attacking Syria. It poses no existential threat to the U.S. or, probably, to Israël. 

The blood-drunk anarchy that will engulf the land after a hopelessly under-resourced intervention will be far more ominous to the region’s only democracy, Israël. Details, details; sniff, sniff. These general critiques are damning enough to argue against the threatened intervention by invasion rumoured as being discussed in Paris and Washington.

The ‘Antony’ factor is the one that worries me most. It became obvious that the Iraqi Ministry of Interior was fast becoming the “Ministry of Death” in 2005 as Shi´ite militias thoroughly compromised the police force. Then along came the idea of partitioning Iraq into ethno-sectarian super-regions a year later with the constitution.

The worst case scenario emerged of a general Persian-Arab conflict fought out on Iraqi soil. 
That scenario leads me to say that I may well burn in Hell for supporting the invasion of Iraq, which I did and, on balance, still do. Now to explain the logic, that scenario assumed that Iraq would split up into regions and a sectarian civil war would break out.

As the Sunnis would likely be slaughtered by the Shi´ite militias supported by Iran, Sunni-Arab neighbors – like Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Turkey as well as, perhaps, more distant lands like Egypt and the Emirates – would intervene to aid the Iraqi Sunnis and to hip-check Iran. 
That would lead to an Iranian invasion of Southern Iraq to protect Shi’ites and, more importantly, to grab the oil so plentiful in that part of a great and beleaguered land.

The majority of Shi’ites not involved with the militias would side eventually with the Sunni countries as fellow Arabs. What would really happen is anybody’s guess. It would be ugly.  The analysis here may have many flaws; at least, it is based on one irrefutable premise: that the Middle East and Persian Gulf is taut with tension where a miscalculation can occur and cascade.


Now we come back to Syria. While that initial scenario did not involve Syria directly (presuming its neutrality until the minority régime would get a bloody boot from the majority Sunni Arabs), the current situation and a push toward an overtly American role in trying to 'fix' it, could easily spiral out of control. 

In 2005, such a scenario with Syria seemed  less likely, even with the Lebanese uprising. Yet in 2012, we are at the end-point of years of demonizing Iran, making the country’s twice-elected president some type of satanic monster. We willfully overlook the presence of a strong middle class and a long tradition of a cosmopolitan culture.

These forgotten or overlooked Iranians will eventually undo the theocratic tyranny that rules the country now. Like it or not, the issue about a nuclear Iran is a red herring meant to obscure the perceived U.S. interest in preventing Iran’s ascent as a regional hegemon. 
Iran has largely remained peaceful; it is we who have been aggressive.

Iran may well instigate Southern Iraq into establishing itself as a super-region under the country's American-crafted and stunningly out-of-touch 'Constitution'. Then Iran will try to seduce that region into becoming a subtle satellite flying an Iraqi flag that flutters toward Teheran. That translates into different tariffs and border policies favouring Iran over Iraq.


Relative to Syria, that is to say: in the wider context of the unrelenting, albeit largely non-lethal, aggression shown toward Iran for years, a U.S. intervention in Syria (and that is how Teheran would likely view a N.A.T.O. military action without an explicit and demonstrable U.S. absence) would entail relentless bombing, perhaps an invasion, followed by the likely assassination of a pro-Persian dictator. 

That train of events could threaten Iran (from her perspective, not ours).
  The leadership in Teheran, increasingly insecure in Iran, could think that we are intent on breaking up what is a mythic crescent in the first place. That perception by Iran would elicit strong, though likely covert, responses. With the U.S. seen to be leading the charge, Israël would likely be blamed also for instigating the overthrow and the bloody civil war that has engulfed Syria.

The two allies would be viewed as trying to destroy Islam, whether or not that sentiment were true.  And that idea is probably not true. With small miscalculations, that could lead to a muscular Iranian response, through Iraq or Kurdistan, enough to precipitate a much larger conflict in which nobody wins but many, many lose their lives.

Monday, December 3, 2012

Letter-71: week-end in Puebla


My stay in Puebla with Mr Jajean Rose and his lovely better half, Ms Ana Hernandez-Balzac, was not only restful but quite a learning experience.  After a mood-settling bus ride, I arrived in Puebla about two hundred miles southeast of Querétaro.  Ana kindly met me at the bus station, which gave me a chance to catch up.  Before I launch into what may seem like a simple recounting of conversations that we all have every day, I want to say that these two Peace Corps volunteers are interesting people and are well worth the recount.

Ana filled me in on the imminent end for her and Jajean of their tours with the Peace Corps and some prospects emerging for them.  I have been keeping my fingers crossed that Jajean will enjoy an emerging opportunity to work for a land conservation organization in New England.  Ana is looking at applying concepts of living space management from Europe in the United States.

This would be an advancement in planning and reminiscent of the quip of many historians that Europe tends to trend a generation ahead of the United States.  We arrived to the office shared by Ana and her husband, Jajean, in the local office of the national environmental ministry, wherein Jajean filled me in on his current efforts.

Jajean has been a life-long birder and has given full reign to his two first loves: birding and his birding wife. He has put together, as a product of his own initiative, the first catalogue of local species of birds for the State of Puebla.  The Municipio of Puebla has three and the State six million people.  This job of re-writing, collating personal photographs and keeping the text accessible to non-birders is a far bigger effort than it sounds.

Why?  Later in the week-end, Jajean and Ana explained to me the unexpectedly vibrant intellectual world of birding.  Not a staid re-tweet from life at all.  You see, the same bird can have different names in different places – even in a small state like Puebla (i.e., roughly the size of Maryland) – owing to a lack of scientific knowledge compounded by the absence of a standard taxonomy in Spanish, traditional names assigned locally and the multiplicity of indigenous dialects.

Thus, it is quite likely that a group of people looking at the same heron will delight in identifying what sounds like three different birds.  Beyond this confusion, the grouping of different species is a moving – no, high-flying – target provoking often heated debates.  For example, Jajean and Ana explained to me – if I remember this discussion well – that falcons are more related to seagulls than to eagles (or inland predators). Tried though they did, this young couple could not ‘shore’ up this and other gaping chasms of my ignorance.

What it all said to me, however, was that this beautifully designed book of fifty pages represented the ´fine-point’ tip a very large iceberg of knowledge, research and professional judgements focused into a first-class product.  Jajean had also spent several months researching the flora and fauna; coordinating the efforts of local academics and birders; as well as composing in Spanish a technical proposal to make an area reservoir, Valsequillo, a ‘Ramsar’ site.

Being designated a 'Ramsar' site would make this reservoir a globally recognized wetlands area, and a site worth saving in México.  Most of us ‘al norte’ have not heard of this designation for two reasons: this 1971 wetlands convention was formalized in Iran and we are the bad boys of wetlands.   The odds were not in Jajean’s favor since the reservoir has been condemned to be a sewage and industrial waste dump.  Most locals (known as poblanos) had given up on Valsequillo as a lost cause.

Not Jajean Rose: his spirited efforts overcame probabilities and institutional resistance, not the least of which was that an ‘extranjero’ led the charge.  Nevertheless, the reservoir and its adjacent land were designated as a Ramsar site by the Mexican government earlier this year.  All this was on Jajean’s spare time while he did more mundane things (i.e., office-work) for the Environmental Ministry.  Ana has been doing outreach work on eco-education as well as protection in the use of Valsequillo, a biosphere nearly twice the size of Pittsburgh.

We closed the night talking about the re-election of President Obama and the trends my friends see in – as well as their beliefs about – American politics.  On Saturday morning, the three of us joined six other volunteers and about twenty-five poblanos, with a collective wing-span of three generations, in Puebla to go bird-watching for about five hours in the Valsequillo biosphere.
The great thing about bird-watching, for those who do it, is that it provides an opportunity for enjoying a shared interest, for healthy debate among experts (or at least those who know a hell of a lot more than I do) and for catching up among friends.  Since Jajean was actually leading the tour, I did not get to yammer with him too much during that stretch.  As I like to do with happy couples (being a ‘confined’ bachelor myself), I asked Ana how these two met.

It is a wonderful story.  Jajean had finished his undergraduate work at the University of Buffalo – quite the under-rated school smack-center in the burr-zone of Northern New York State – while Ana had studied at a University in Puerto Rico (where her French ancestors had settled as migrating Communards in the 1870s).  Ana and Jajean met at the University of Buffalo in the same graduate program in (I believe) urban planning.  Ana had been a birder since high-school.

When they happened upon lunch together, Jajean apparently asked Ana about her interests.  Now as young students, I suspect that more than a few of us agonized over what to disclose, lest something come across as quirky…Not Ana.  As she told me (in effect), “I really don’t know but I just decided to be who I was…and so I said I like bird-watching…”  I can see in my mind´s eye twenty-five or so poblanos who were very glad that Ana made that decision several years ago.

Jajean apparently did a double-take…”¿¡bird-watching!?”  And the rest is a history that ably affirms the aphorism that birds of a feather do indeed flock together.  I also had a chance to meet three new environmental volunteers who had just moved out to their centers after plus catch up with an acquaintance stationed in the area for over a year.  Finally, I got to spend some time with another great Peace Corps couple just as they were heading home to the United States.

One of the newbettes teased me mercilessly about my bird-brain or lack thereof, we both got a good laugh out of it.  The irony is that, if a guy had said these things, I might well have taken umbrage and raised a fuss. Yet, when such ribbing comes from a fair lass, I feel perversely praised...  The couple that is leaving is looking to create a business that would enable public schools to out-source the teaching of a religion course without getting snared in Church-State issues .

First, there would be a degree of separation so the public school is not directly promoting a religion or the concept of religion in general. Additionally, the idea does not represent a traditional religion course in the sense of comparing and contrasting faiths but a course in pursuing a spiritual dimension through authentic American voices like those of Martin Luther King, Ralph Waldo Emerson, Jonathan Edwards, Martin Buber, etc.

These ideas enliven me and that is why I always enjoy listening to the visions of these and other extraordinary young people.  The course-work would also include spiritual practices like meditation, yoga, etc. to give children a base on which to anchor their future lives in a spirit based on values from America past and present. What  a pity (for me) that I did not meet this couple, the wife of which was a spitting image – more by temperament – of one of my favorite cousines, Katy Koppanyi.

Now bird-watching itself has always been a subject of curiosity for me, never fulfilled due to my lack of patience and discipline to learn at every opportunity.  Anyways, I learned many things in those five hours. The most important was why I had admired so much two teachers under whom I had been lucky enough to flounder as a fifteen year old.

Long after these mentors had won my lifelong respect (i.e., within a couple of weeks), I found out that they shared one thing in common: bird-watching.  One had been a Rhodes Scholar and the other had been one of a very few who booked on Milgram after the third switch.

That morning, with half a dozen Peace Corps types and two dozen poblanos, I learned the reason why bird-watching made those two teachers so special, as it does these two friends four decades later.  It is an activity – though often punctuated by little, almost reticent, movements – that requires a patience that few people have.  Beyond that and good eyesight, it requires the ability focus one’s kinetic and intellectual energies minutely to dis-embed frequently camouflaged birds from subtly hued backgrounds.

Like Zen masters, then, bird-watchers have that ability to harness their humanly fragmented minds into a focus that, with time, becomes a beam of conscience.  Bird-watchers not only know their species, they know their birds. Even a 'lard-carrying' member of the "booboisie" like me understands how timid the great majority of birds really are.

To approach these beautiful beings requires time, patience, a little stealth in silence.  Beyond the absence of sudden movements apt to startle a bird into flight, I sensed that the really good birders could almost connect with the objects of their commitment and costly cameras.  This rare ability to focus one’s being in the here-and-now, not to mention an uncommon ability to connect on some level with an animal, are traditional signs of an elevated conscience.

The last thing I learned was that there is great humor in all of this heady stuff.  For example, catching a bird in the act on camera is almost impossible to do by design, but those ‘poopoorazzis’ lucky enough to catch the fecal flight-line have set up a site to document forever their moments of shutter-clicking shame.  It seems that the private world of birding has its own exclusive club of bathroom humor.

Afterward, we took two hour naps, which benefitted me a great deal and then out for a night on the town. Those who know me well know that I am ‘rather sedate’ (i.e., dull), especially as I do not like alcohol. Fortunately, this preference against pursuing the spirits worked for my far more interesting hosts, too.  We had an elegant dinner and I had some of the best mole (pronounced moe-lay) ever with delicious chicken.

Yummy.

For two or three hours we walked around the ‘Centro’ (the old town) and I got to see first-hand just what a beautiful city Puebla really is.  Americans are indirectly familiar with Puebla because it was here, one hundred fifty years ago, that the Mexicans defeated the French on the ‘cinco de mayo’ 1862 to curtail any further sustained hegemony from outside powers.

In truth, Corona Beer has managed to make ‘el cinco de mayo’ a larger figment of American culture than fixture in the Mexican.   One reason why this holiday may be less important than others in Mexico – so I have heard – is that poblanos are snooty and think they are better than everybody else.  Well, permit me to report that poblanos are not at all conceited.  Truthfully, I found the people to be friendly and cosmopolitan. They reflect their city.  Puebla is truly an international city.

As we roamed those streets, I would find that some blocks would remind me of Paris – complete with a grand bistro parisien – while others were more like Madrid and still others like Italy.  Another interesting facet of this city, which makes it worthwhile to visit, is the ‘story of the block’.  It seemed that every block in the core part of the Centro had a building with an interesting history, either an old art-school (with representations of different types) converted into museums.

My favorite story involved the frieze around the door of a grand old home that related a relatively recent legend of a man who (I believe) had lost a son to some nasty serpent from a nearby river (paved into the history books some sixty years ago) that came slithering to shore every night.  In any case, the grieving father let it be known that whoever felled the serpent by his own hand would win the hand of his daughter.  Well, this campesino, who was an Arthurian type (i.e., from modest means but innately patrician), did away with that serpent, married rich and learned to love.

Proved to this paragon of downward mobility (i.e., me) that upward mobility is still alive and well…yeah!

Monday, November 19, 2012

Letter #70: on the road in México

The only criticism that sticks is self-criticism.  Not that criticism from others does not matter; it often does.  Nevertheless, one has to open himself to at least the possibility of that external criticism’s validity.  At that point, the mere ‘mulling over’ of the criticism, if short of outright admission, appropriates it into one’s conscience.  Then the salutary effect of self-criticism begins its drill.  A colleague of mine chastised me recently for having no sense of Mexican culture.

Now, my personality is one sensitive to slights with a propensity to fights.  That leaves little room for an open mind, unless that person who makes that criticism does something to prove his character (i.e., something beneficial to me that shows the ability of the other to rise above a contest of wills).  No need for details here as it became clear, on even cursory examination, that my colleague was on-the-mark.  Her good-will not only displayed her enlightenment, it inspired a little more in me.

Hopefully, and God-willing (given my lazy ass), I will take better advantage of what Mexico has to offer in the time remaining to me here.  This week-end, I got off to a marvelous start.  There are seven volunteers in my class whom I have admired greatly.  They really are worth my emulation, not of behavior (for that is Emersonian suicide), but of refinement, conscience and vision.  I had wanted to visit all seven. 

This week-end, I visited numbers four and five in Puebla.  The two out west I will never get to, and what regret I have for rationalizing my leaden posterior.  To be sure, they were quite open and even suggestive of a week-end visit.  Simply said, I lost an opportunity of a life-time; perhaps not a critical opportunity, but one that shall not come my way again.  The bus ride from Puebla is four hours long, often a deterrent in itself.  The week-end was charmed right from the bus ride.

It is two weeks since Día de Muertos here in México.  It is, as I wrote recently, a holy day not to be summarily dismissed as a pleasant uniqueness worth chatting about when discussing Frida Kahlo or the symbology of the Grateful Dead to prove my sophistication (even though I am thirty years late in these inferences).  It goes far deeper than my worldly images within, and the other-worldly images around, me that are made all the more so by a profusion of colors lighting up scattered skulls.  Well, that haunting image of the verdancy and verity of death in our everyday life did not happen on the bus ride.

What did happen is that the sun set, not in the opalescent sky of Fitzgerald (which I have yet to see on any of the five continents in which I have travelled).  The sky was cloudy, hinting of a rain yet but never to come.  It was melancholy, to which I am more accustomed as it splits the middle of the Mexican life-and-death paradox.  The colors blended various shades of sulfur and grey into a sublime, subdued majesty.  I was listening to music that was heavy 'moog' but not heavy 'boge' (for once); it, too, had a certain sweet sadness. 

The skyline, sinking into night and losing itself on the high peaks of the central highlands, swished by, displaying the silhouettes of the squat trees of Mexico atop some hill, with slopes of nopales (cactuses that look like a Kalderesque agglomeration of green, prickly basset hound ears), emptying into harvested fields, that looked wasted by drought, with the refuse swept into witches’ broom bottoms.  It was not hard to get that there was something silently extraordinary about this random collision of sight and sound.  I had last seen it more than thirty years before driving in the early winter back to Washington after a week-end in Pittsburgh with parents who loved me so. 

The trees, in the grey, almost nocturnal, February sky, bereft of life as they had been for months, still reached into high, whispering something I could not quite hear.  In truth, I felt it first shortly after arriving to high school, when I crept desperately alone into the least popular place on campus (i.e., the chapel) to read and later sing privately, hymn 507 (1940 Hymnal).  Ten years later – after the death of my erstwhile sweet-heart, the suicide of two close friends and many opportunities already forfeited  I had decided that life goes on and it was time to fill in and pave over the piss-puddle and move on.  That felt like the right thing to do.

Only now, thirty years after making that decision, on a bus in the middle of Mexico, was I willing to open that door again; or, more properly said, was I given the chance to open that door again.  This time, I had some reference of time and a preference of place.  Mexico’s forever mystical culture girded me on that bus.  Beyond, the simple matter of my own mortality, I began to feel a deeper presence of God, one that I had not felt for thirty years, save for the death of my parents, my uncle and my brother-in-law’s father.  Those came out of necessity of blood-ties severed and the departure of a great man whom I’d like to be. 

It was also fitting because I was on that bus out of a choice to visit two of the best Peace Corps volunteers, both bird watchers (explanation forthcoming in the next essay).  As I listened to that synthetic melancholy paired with the sublime sadness of the dying horizon, I realized that paving over the cesspool perhaps had not been meet and right so to do.  Nonetheless, I could not – and still can not – imagine what would happen were I surrender my life to wandering between slices of the past ricocheting through my future while standing arrested in the present, undoing, enveloped by the chaos so truly at the core of our universe.  Life is better left to others to figure out. 

That Mexican culture of death in life brings to focus the strength of her mysticism: the necessity of focusing on fun today, on children today, on celebrating the quiet ascendancy of indigenous beliefs to bring Catholicism back to life.  There is a humility in this alien culture that may defeat its becoming another Silicon Valley of innovation, as I so often argue, as this country's destiny.  Yet that grand vision, as well and intellectually argued it may or may not be, implies that Silicon Valley is something to which all BRICS and TMIMBIs alike ought properly to aspire to.  Mexican culture, often so backward to my untrained and culturally vacuous eye, offers so much more. 

In actuality, I still do not know what that 'more' is, but I keep trying to find out, one day at a time.  Truth is, I will know that gold standard when first I see its gleam.  Hopefully, I will get more into the deep-water swing of things Mexican to pass along better information.

Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Letter-68: another ridiculous exercise in self-importance

Now that the election is thankfully over, I have a confession to make before I return to normal. After watching, from afar, the performance of President Obama during Hurricane Sandy, I have come to believe that I would have voted for him, changing over from voting for Governor Romney on election day. As it is, I was content with my third-party vote because I sense that many of the things percolating through these ‘fringe’ elements today will be the mainstay of our discourse tomorrow. And we need fresh discourse.

There are other reasons, besides being a Pisces, why I would have so brazenly undecided my way into the Democrats. (Get a clue, Ned, no one cares.) As a conservative and as a Republican, two elements of this election were offensive to me. And they came from my own party. First, I cannot recall an election in my lifetime, at least one that I followed, where an anti-democratic élite tried so brazenly to finance an outcome. It made me shudder.

This second ‘doozie’ may have occurred at some other time and I was simply too out-to-lunch to get it. Nevertheless, I found the concerted effort to intimidate and disenfranchise minorities to be, well, disgusting. It was something beneath the dignity of our people. What perhaps frightened me the most was how quickly I acclimated myself to this racism.

For example, in the third debate (during the one intemperate moment that I recall the President displaying through months of grueling work and astounding pressure), I found myself thinking, “Well aren’t you uppity?” Trust me when I say that, had Vice President Biden or Governor Romney or Representative Ryan said the same, I might have been irate but not thinking he was uppity. Strange thing is that I do not recall feeling that ever in 2008.

Race was an issue, at least for me, I regret to admit.

Since his election the first time, President Obama has impressed me as among the best America can produce. His policies? Way, way different story. You all know well that I am unsure of many things and often insecure these days. Yet President Obama – unimaginative and dangerous as some of his policies are – remains one of the finest people we have elected to the Presidency.

As I said to a Peace Corp bud, President Obama – from my Republican view – is a great, great man with terrible policies. Unfortunately, though I felt sorry for the savagery of political attacks against him since many seemed to be based on his being very wealthy, Governor Romney lost my vote for certain things he said or did that led me question his fitness for the oval office.

First and by far foremost, he politicized the Libya murders and the protests in Cairo from Day-1. Governor Romney and Representative Ryan showed two unsavory elements of their personalities. Namely, these guys were willing to say anything or disregard the grievous loss of anybody to get elected. They vastly under-estimated the common sense of the people they had asked to vote for them. Most Americans instinctively knew that, frustrating and outrageous as this terror attack was, it was unfair to blame the president for it.

Second, both Governor Romney and Representative Ryan never answered questions transparently asked on how they could balance the budget and cut tax-rates when eliminated deductions could not close the budget-breach likely to ensue. To re-name that old rock song from the Chicago Transit Authority (‘25 or 6 to 4’), this was 59 or five to zero.

Third, Governor Romney’s incessant opposition to defense cuts under sequestration and to ObamaCare indicated to me that he would rather sustain an over-extended military force on a war-time procurement footing than strive to secure the right to at least minimal health care. The latter is a thorny question and I dislike health-care reform as it currently stands because I do not think we can afford it. Nevertheless, when intelligent analysis demonstrates that the mandatory defense cuts under sequestration amount to levels seen in past post-war demobilizations, this rhetoric displays a deeply ingrained preference of guns over butter.

http://www.csbaonline.org/publications/2012/08/analysis-of-the-fy2013-defense-budget-and-sequestration/  

So, much as I prefer not to see Republicans lose, there are reasons why I am happy with the vote a week ago for proving, at least for now, the following precarious principles:
  1. An election can not be bought.
  2. Poor voters can not be disenfranchised or intimidated.
  3. Fear and anger need not dominate the national discourse.
  4. A political party can not undermine a President and get away with it..
We do not need to attack Iran or anybody else.
I am sure I will have my problems with the President over the next four years (like anybody really cares) but these things I have mentioned were attacks on values that mean a lot to me. The Republicans are defending other important values, as I have written. Sadly, I was so focussed on finding things wrong with President Obama that I overlooked equally corrosive, if not more subversive, thinking from my side.

Saturday, November 3, 2012

Día de Muertos; Night and day

Well, I have voted for Governor Gary Johnson and the Libertarians while President Obama is headed toward re-election by six to twelve percentage points; that is to say that I am done with politics for now. To be sure, if I were given a dinner to dine with the President, I would step back and let Representative Ron Paul to take my place and talk some sense to a good man about why the Constitution matters. Representative Paul is brave enough to say what needs to be said, and the President is big enough to listen.

In any case, other parts of life are important besides politics. One of those is sometimes cluing into the Mexican culture. November the 2nd is the day to do it. El Día de Muertos is an important holiday, likely the second or third most important of the festival calendar that Mexico follows. In Mexico, you see, it is about process, about the journey. In some ways this idea may reach back not only to Spain but to the Muslim influence of a wandering worship, never quite settled anywhere.

Halloween is the closest day – both in spirit and in imagination – that we Americans have got to Día de Muertos. And it is not so close. For most of us up North, Halloween is that one night when otherwise demure women dress in tight-fitting witch’s outfits. For this one night, at least, these women get to flout everything that keeps them proper. The men are no better, running around in tights trying to entice the witches in rhe same way they already find themselves seduced.

With this frame of reference, I assumed that my Mexican counterparts, far more elaborate with the make-up, were after something else than the chill of an autumn’s breath that so often brought the moistened lips together, together enough to cover up the moon the for others in the back-seat. All this is to say, I qualify as an unashamed cultural dunderhead, becoming curious as to what the Mexicans actually do with all of this ‘dead’ stuff anyway.

So what do dunderheads do on the afternoon of this obviously important day? They go out to check out the Día de Muertos to find where their alienated minds can dissolve, at least momentarily, into the muffled, rumbling energy of the trickling crowd. This they cannot do alone as foreigners, since such heavy-tipping guttural beings would not last in the activities, extended beyond normal times through soft gaits and averted eyes. So they get a guide, usually a local friend, who understands dead people.

At the suggestion of a dear and dearly Mexican friend, I went into Querétaro this evening. This city, where I serve in the Peace Corps, is steeped in history; over-packed with legend; teeming with old-looking churches that create a sense of proper Catholic gloom. As I approached the chore, I recalled some forgotten elements of the past to right-size this mysterious dimension that remains so very confusing to me.

Years ago, I went to a Halloween Party where the men were dressed for success and women to excess. Before going to what I suspected might just be a wild party, I pulled down from the book-shelf a heavily hi-lited and disgustingly dog-eared Golden Bough by Malcolm Fraser (I think his name was) and tried to track down the family roots of Halloween. As usual, the day or night had been a pagan ritual in Europe, complete with bonfires, which the Roman Church had integrated into its body of belief. I read on. The witch’s and ugly monster costumes were worn to scare off the real witches, goblins and evil spirits.

In other parts of Europe, others dressed up in the clothes reminiscent of certain dearly departed relatives to try to reach back and invite their ghosts back to the home for just one more family dinner…like Eurydice’s humid whisper and then be gone. Still other Europeans dressed like people of whom they knew and from whom they needed help from beyond. That one doesn’t work; that I know. For several years I went as Jimmy Hoffa and my pension is still underwater.

My friend and I visited three altars before dinner. She explained to me what the Día de Muertos meant. I figured it was all about what Fraser said so long ago, but properly British anthropology for once was only tangentially related. The costumes, I think, represent the dead coming back, not by posing as a ‘fabric’-ated invitation for the departed, but to act in the stead of the dead themselves. Funny, it’s the Muertos who are desperate to return, if only for a moment – at least on that night (though, again like Islam or Judaism, after sun-down of All Saints Day).

During the day itself, much time is spent at the cemetery praising the family and openly mourning the dust-to-dust crowd. Happily, I have witnessed these truly moving rituals – which represent, after all, a wise and lovely integration of death into the continuity of life. Little brat that I was in college, I still marvel at the accidental wisdom of one of my favorite lines from those days: you have to understand death to live life.  Yet, the darker, questioning and hissy-fit side of me wonders how few of my loved ones will show up at my grave, ever.

We did see three altars. The native art, for which I have little abiding fondness (I am a Luddite in process), is amazingly precise. On a temporary mural, there were many ‘concheros’ (native dancers with percussion shells wrapped around the lower legs to make a lot of rhythm) and other 'indígenas' hunting, dancing and maybe even looking for an Oxxo (i.e., the Mexican equivalent of a 7-11). The interesting thing was none of these otherwise admirably painted figures had eyes. 

My friend, a sweet Mexican lady, felt a little creeped out by the no-eyes thing.  Always the Prince Charmless, I pointed out that they had no eyes because the mural went up in a day and did not permit time for a detailed and time consuming task like painting eyes. Her big Mexican eyes, brown like the soil that gives her kin life, took one hell of a long time, in her case, to go around in a fool circle. Wupps…soy norteamericano; I know, I know…presumed ugly until proven dead.

The other side of the altar had elaborate flower arrangements, two shaped like doves. I wondered if these ‘florid’ displays were patches of Heaven. Then it also occurred to me that the Muslim influence was at work again.  Mexican women I know remind very much of the women I have met across Arabia; that is, exquisite, sombrously sensual, quick and hinting of something else…too refined for my more mundane or simply secular tastes. 

Of course, this was not an altar, nor a garden in the human sense, not even Heaven, or at least as I might bother to conceive it.  This altar broings to life those riveting descriptions of the gardens of Eden in The Holy Qur’an, flowing with colors, drenched in fruit, served by the dark, mysterious women who excite ideas and intuitions of things eternal and divine, even in the dullest of dullards. No wonder I fall in love every week.

We went to the altar in the government building. It had more of a traditional Mexican feel with its ponderous, if colorful, geometry. As we walked around that altar, each of the four sides celebrated the life of a Queretanos worthy of respect, worthy of a visit this one night through a historically simulated, town-sponsored memory that beckons emulation by lesser mortals (e.g., me).

One was a British lady who had emigrated to Mexico at an advanced age as a botanist who always had preferred planting to bantering. She lived until the age of ninety, being recognized by her gracious hosts, not only as one with Queretaro but one for Queretaro, too.  The others featured were social activists in education, fighting poverty and journalism. Queretaro is rather political in its down-time.

The neat part was that these four were honoured under the view of the founding fathers – and mother – painted larger than life on a permanent mural as if to remind all of us that these people, not so famous as those who fought for the Independencia, were worthy of the same veneration, at least this one day, this 2nd day of November.

The last altar was a makeshift remembrance of the great crime of our time, as the altar would have it, of some 85,000 people killed by the narco-violence. For every sign that called out President Calderon (whom I admire deeply) as a mass-murderer for trying to restore a rule of law, there were others reminding people that the soon to be inaugurated president, , would be dishonest dictator, a madman, a homicidal homosexual, or matinee idol in beach movies.

Worst of all, this President Peña-Nieto would be a mere political plaything for, and puppet of a former President from the 1990s who, amazingly, remains a power-player notwithstanding his small problem of bankrupting the country as he vied for the Presidency of the W.T.O. That number of 85,000 right above the Guy Fawkes mask (like the one from the movie ‘V’) shows that, while the many children who died were unknown, unnamed, unimportant, ‘Anonymous’ was anything but and was not about to let that any shroud of cold indifference snuff out their tragically truncated relevance.

The evening closed with a pleasant dinner at an inexpensive but yummy family restaurant. We talked about the Day of the Dead and what it meant. Then my friend remembered how a plant she had from her ex-boyfriend had died when he had left her. She had put the plant aside to keep it out of her sight because it reminded her of him; nonetheless, she was diligent in taking care of the plant. Yet it died.

My friend went on to say she felt like she had withdrawn her affection from the plant and that is what it made it die. And every day she waters that plant, trying to talk to it, coax it back to life; alas, to no effect. Then and there I realized that, once again, God has blessed me with special friends, not because they think I am great but because I know how great they are.

We went onto talk about the Dead who return on this November 2nd. I was curious, as a typically flabby-assed agnostic (one class of Zumba-hasta-la-Tumba, notwithstanding). So do they come back because we miss them or they miss us or both? Particularly, those who were and are important to us. Do these people return to mend us so we can put one-foot-in-front-of-the-other? In this day of defiance and death, are we celebrating that quality of life that is even unhindered by death? Of course, I do not know.

Well one thing led to another and, with our clothes still on, we started talking about angels and guardian angels that just flutter around happily, far out of the very limited world of my mind, though some 70% of Americans surveyed believe in angels; I think they are idiots who confuse drones with angels. That begged the question about the after-life.

Mexicans love talking about the after-life, in general because this is a naturally mystical people.  They also do it with me more to probe the depth of my faith or the degree of apostasy. My standard answer is, “Is there an after-life? I will be sure to sne da post-card when I get there…” My friend, a devout Catholic, turned serious about this. So my question to her is my question to you this day of the dead.

If we are created in God’s image and we evolve to His perfection upon our death, how do we ever hook-up with anyone in Heaven? It is our imperfections that make us different from (and place us firmly below) God, at least in this vale of tears. Flaws make us different from each other; hell, they make us distinctive so we recognize each other as separate. Once we get to heaven, and the dark sides of our loved ones are now removed as they participate in the pure light of God’s love, how can we hope to distinguish one from another?

That being of pure light – yes that one over there – that might be dad; shoot, turns out to be Mr Waverly, the prick who cut me from the track team. Hmmm. Since I am stuck here, I really no longer have to worry about the customary scorn of the politically correct when I say, “Jeez, which one is dad? You all look the same to me….”

My friend, however, had an even-tempered response, beyond, “Oh, you gringos…” to reflect that maybe it did not matter. After all, would we be selfish enough to desire the pain of our loved ones of being separated from perfection so that we could recognize them? Well my dad still owes me twenty bucks from when I was a kid.

Perhaps that was the lesson of the Día de Muertos for me today: that bereavement of knowing that I may never be able to make the apologies owed to certain friends died young for things I did or failed to say. With grief taken to such an unchanging, eternal level, perhaps a day dedicated to these ‘honoured dead’ can be that critical half-measure that makes us closer to whole….